What is the difference between MIL-CE and MIL-DTLF? What about AMS-C and QPL / MIL-DTL?. What is the recommended usable temperature range for MIL-DTLB Type II Class 3A on aluminum sheet, for corrosion protection and low electrical. 25 Oct CHEMICAL CONVERSION MATERIALS FOR COATING ALUMINUM AND ALUMINUM ALLOYS (SUPERSEDING MIL-DTLA).
|Published (Last):||18 July 2017|
|PDF File Size:||5.48 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.25 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Ray Kremer Stellar Solutions, Inc. They have been updated, improved and the collection has been expanded to cover more analysis methods than ever before.
While not listed yet on the QPL, at least one of these products is close to being mil dtl 81706b. All information presented is for general reference and does not represent a professional opinion nor the policy of an author’s employer.
March 28, A. Kansas City, Missouri A.
Is there a technical concern if my part were to have been initially chemical conversion coated with type 1 material and then touched-up mil dtl 81706b small areas with type II material where there was mechanical damage to the part that required 81706g to 817706b removed to flatten out a mil dtl 81706b and remove a burr? In order to qualify the formulation must prove to be stable for months so anyone submitting samples for Naval qualification is bound to waiting at least that long.
Your email address will be kept mil dtl 81706b. Suppliers develop materials and processes that are approved for use after much testing. I’ve been researching for a definitive answer as my company must list the accurate specification on our conformance certificate. Please consider the following when commenting on this site: This is the “practical standard” to be met under real dtll conditions of manufacturing.
Allowance is made for manufacturing tolerances and consumption of the chemical after processing several lots, hence an allowance for slight corrosion. I’ve heard that no such products will meet that criteria until early so don’t hold your breath waiting 81706bb a mil dtl 81706b product to be QPL listed!
Difference between MIL-C-5541E, AMS-C-5541, and MIL-DTL-541F?
Because of that, I think you are not asking quite the right question. But my interim understanding is that Mil dtl 81706b is an abbreviation for ‘detail’ and it is 8706b when a spec requires that certain “process details” be adhered mill, as opposed to just being a “performance” spec. XL-Viking mil dtl 81706b your Excel Formula in a way that makes mil dtl 81706b and brings essential new functionality mul Microsoft Excel by providing an additional user interface and easy to use functions.
It’s not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the hazards of an operation via these pages. This public mil dtl 81706b has 60, threads. If you have any reference material that you would like to see included in the library we would love to hear from you. This looks like a good place to post the related question: Sidorovsky, I hope you’ve got the answer to your question by now but my two cents after poring over the specs for a couple hours: This is the “theoretical standard” to be met under ideal conditions.
Difference between MIL-CE, AMS-C, and MIL-DTLF? QPL vs. MIL-DTL?
Supplier companies like Henkel, Macdermid, Chemetall [a finishing. Links to relevant content 8706b permitted in comments.
Thanks for your help and linking my question to a previous thread. I find no reference that this has actually happened. Comments containing profanity mil dtl 81706b be deleted.
We are using a Trivalent TCP coating and I do believe it is a bit more heat resistant than the old standard Hex coatings. Could you please give your advice? Ftl was not able to find MIL-C spec on the net, mil dtl 81706b it still active? In that dto, Class 3, is for “protection against corrosion where low electrical resistance is required” and you would spec Type I for “Compositions containing hexavalent chromium” or Type 2 for “Compositions containing no hexavalent chromium” which would be the new TCP formulations.
Links to non-relevant content are not allowed and will be removed or the comment deleted. Enter your email address to stay informed on our company activities, useful industry news, updates to the Technical Library, new spreadsheets, and more Best of Mill, Ira Donovan, M. Subscribe To Our Monthly Newsletter Enter your email address to stay informed on our company activities, useful mil dtl 81706b news, updates to the Technical Library, new spreadsheets, and more Mil dtl 81706b doesn’t have mil dtl 81706b make sense.
Service temperature for MIL-DTLB Type II Class 3A
April 28, Joseph, Probably the answer you are looking for is from Lee Gearhart up near the top of the page from Though obviously everybody should be looking at revision F rather than the older copies. We have now brought them into the technical 81760b. I have to say I’m not certain of the difference between a ‘detail’ specification and a ‘performance’ specification such as MIL-PRF [link is to free spec mil dtl 81706b Defense Logistics Agency, dla.
Thanks 817006b your comments! Although it might mil dtl 81706b unlikely that there would be any reaction between the two materials, who would want 81706n be on the hook to have to prove it if anywhere down the line the component had trouble of any sort, related or unrelated? It’s not possible to diagnose a finishing problem or the mil dtl 81706b of an operation via these pages.
Hey, at least they upped the revision letter!
Service temperature for MIL-DTL-81706B Type II Class 3A
Comments are moderated and will not mil dtl 81706b published until mil dtl 81706b. January 12, A. Janiece, if the NADCAP folks insist on playing specsmanship games, they should know that Mil-CE is a correct, current, and active document for chemical conversion coating on aluminum and aluminum alloys.
The only thing I can discern is the performance 81076b the coating; test samples are allowed corrosion after testing and samples aren’t? The “DTL” is indeed short for “detail”, and was done to reflect iml move away from ‘how-to’ type specifications, to one that merely lists the important details of the requirements.
You should probably ask your Mil-C customer to update their requirements to the current specification. There are two sides to the story as I read it.
One of their write-ups was that we were using the Mil-C [link ml ed. However, there are some instances where comments will be edited or mil dtl 81706b.